enter "tutsi jews" in Google, and here what you get:

To put it baldly: Jews did not invade Germany with the massive military and logistical support of a neighboring state; nor did they once rule Germany as the political instrument of an absolute monarchy; nor were they identified with a ruling ethnocracy; nor did Jewish elements commit a partial genocide of non-Jews in a neighboring state 22 years before the Holocaust. Again, Jews did not stand accused of murdering the head of state of a neighboring state (as happened in Burundi with the assassination of Melchior Ndadaye in October 1993). And while Jews were insistently accused by the Nazi propaganda mill of working hand in hand with Bolchevism to subvert the state, at no time did their actions, within or outside Germany, lend the slightest credibility to these accusations. Immensely more threatening was the military posture of the RPF on the eve of the Rwanda genocide.

© Disconnecting the Threads: Rwanda and the Holocaust Reconsidered

To put it simply, Tutsi were guilty. Jews were not. Tutsi got what they deserved. Probably Armenians were also guilty of something ... There's just one nation in the world, not guilty. By definition. I love this "To put it baldly ..." opener ...  ¶ 9:37 AM