... correct analysis was one thing, but correct solutions were another, and the lack of the latter did not invalidate the former.
He felt jerked around by his own dick, as if the rest of him was merely an inconsequential knob that happened to be attached to one end of it. May be the thingg would be happier if left to roam arond on his own.
... because he'd been too rough and fast and had not said anything flattering to her the way he usually did. Great ass and so on and so forth.
He shouldnt't have been so crabby. She was a fine woman with real tits and problems of her own.
If you were ninety and you had a chance for one last fuck but you knew it would kill you, would you still do it?
Had he been a lunatic or an intellectually honorable man who'd thought things through to their logical conclusion? And was there any difference?
[Был ли он лунатик или интеллектуально честный человек, который видел вещи как они есть на самом деле, вплоть до логического завершения? И есть ли разница между тем и этим?]
This book was recommended to me by an English major very close to graduating. I no longer talk to her.
"Cliched and unimaginative" - by Avidreader "hammonduk" (London, UK)
"A Hugely Disappointing Read" - by John Sheffield (England)
see also / profile / news / nyt / aldaily / mezomorf / ptdr / faulkingtruth / B&W / dissentvoice / Znet / ich / tat / insidehighered / volokh / Candide / regrettheerror / lit / ÑÐ¾Ð¿Ð¾Ñ / Ñж / нло / Swan / СмиÑÑгин / verse / Context / eserver / uspoetry / Orwell / poetrus / СÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¸Ñ / vekperevoda / borderlands / nplusone / review / beliver / grustno / oxonianreview / СÑепанова / sci / gnxp / «ÐС» / csicop / tpm / philosophy.ru / edge / ScienceWars / quack / badscience / ephilosopher / thinkingmeat / comdig / net / stopper / metafilter / discardedlies / eye / follow.ru / pseudology / aabp / dirty.ru / friends / dfot / smoter / robotwisdom / radref / Doctor / kultprosvet / del.icio.us / visiology / ref / ÑловаÑи / The Museum / labaz / answers / translate / Corbett / usingenglish / english88 / askphilosophers / rulex / ebooks / Ðак пÑавилÑно / words / hkshp / encyclopedia / people / schopenhauer / zizek / finkelstein / lindemann / Honderich / MacDonald / turing / Kent Bach / Hoffman / Baez / Reilly / blake / DenisDutton / shamir / Anderson / politics / spengler / ColdWar / H-Net / A Step At A Time / zvezda / nationalism / inthesetimes / incharacter / Cultural Logic / freedom4um / rense / misc / absolute / infidels / пеÑни / ami / ÑÑаÑина / hnn / plagiarist / ibiblio / materialist / bbsonline / samizdat / altruist / zvuki / валÑÑÑ / kingkong / Grover Furr
ÐÑÑÑÑ Ð±ÑдеÑ, как бÑдеÑ,
Ð²ÐµÐ´Ñ ÐºÐ°Ðº-нибÑÐ´Ñ Ð´Ð° бÑдеÑ,
никогда Ñак не бÑло,
ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð½Ð¸ÐºÐ°Ðº не бÑло.
ÐÑли Ð¶Ð¸Ð·Ð½Ñ Ð¿ÑоÑÐµÐºÐ°ÐµÑ Ñ
оÑоÑо,
знаÑиÑ, она дала ÑÑеÑинÑ.
РдейÑÑвиÑелÑноÑÑи вÑе ÑовÑем не Ñак, как на Ñамом деле.